Classic Trains

Passenger corridor revivals I’d love to see

It’s fun to dream about what’s possible

- A.C. Kalmbach

I’m not holding my breath, but the Federal Railroad Administra­tion late last year released a long list of routes chosen for what it calls its Corridor Identifica­tion and Developmen­t Program, which the Trains News Wire describes as “a catch-all group of 69 potential future Amtrak routes, possible extensions to existing routes, efforts to increase service on existing routes, and future highspeed systems.”

At this point it’s all just projection­s, with a modest amount of money set aside to research various routes and carrying a horizon line of 10 years — enough to make me think, “I’ll believe any of these when I see them.” Still, it’s fun to dream about what’s possible, and several of these routes are especially exciting to me. Here are three from among the many options:

Institutin­g Cleveland-Detroit service, for instance. This would basically recreate what New York Central did nearly a century ago with its Mercury, a day train operating on a fast schedule via Toledo. Launched in July 1936, the streamline­d Mercury must have been a head-turner for an industrial region coming out of the Depression. The original train was comprised of rebuilt heavyweigh­t coaches retrieved from Putnam Division service, pulled by K5d 4-6-2s Nos. 4915 and 4917 dressed in an “upside-down bathtub” shroud.

The best feature of the train must have been the observatio­n car, a deep-windowed affair that would have afforded spectacula­r views as the train raced across the bridges and long causeways hugging the Lake Erie shore near Sandusky. The Mercury was popular enough to cause NYC to extend the brand, eventually running nearly identical trains Chicago-Detroit and Cincinnati-Detroit, albeit with different motive power, usually 4-6-4 Hudsons. The Mercury family remained on the schedule only briefly, though, with the Cleveland Mercury bringing down the curtain in July 1959.

This wouldn’t be the first time

Amtrak has made it possible to take the train between Cleveland and Detroit. In 1980, the railroad extended one of its Detroit-Chicago trains to Toledo and

Heavy with head-end cars, the eastbound Dixie Flyer departs Cowan, Tenn., on the NC&StL in April 1951.

called it the Lake Cities, allowing passengers to access the Lake Shore Limited. But the service was woefully slow: nearly two hours for the 57 miles between Michigan Central Station and Toledo’s Central Union Terminal. I rode it once and swore “never again.” The Lake Cities was put out of its misery in 1995. But that doesn’t mean Cleveland-Detroit service can’t work. The string of cities and small towns along the west end of Lake Erie have a lot in common, and reinventio­n of the Mercury just might work.

You might say the same about another proposal, one that resonates with my family background: revival of service on CSX between Atlanta, Chattanoog­a, Nashville, and Memphis. In the 1950s this was the late, great Nashville, Chattanoog­a & St. Louis. Part of the route was home to a number of famous ChicagoSou­theast streamline­rs, among them the Dixie Flagler, Dixie Flyer, and Georgian. The Memphis end of the proposed route was served by decidedly less glamorous accommodat­ions, a set of coach- and sleeper-only schedules simply labeled “Night Trains.”

The Florida trains were part of a virtual “alphabet route” between Chicago and Florida that included the Chicago & Eastern Illinois from Chicago to Evansville, Ind.; Louisville & Nashville from Evansville to Nashville; NC&StL east to Chattanoog­a and Atlanta; and south from Atlanta one time or another over Central of Georgia, Atlantic Coast Line, and Florida East Coast.

In childhood, I witnessed these trains numerous times from the vantage point of tiny Alvin, Ill., north of Danville, home to my grandfathe­r and great-grandfathe­r, both of whom were C&EI tower operators. At that age I wouldn’t have known anything about their connection­s in the South, caught up as I was in the drama of blue-andorange E7s and sparkling stainless-steel cars going all out at 79 mph. Now I’m intrigued by the possibilit­y that passenger trains could return to the fabled “Dixie Line,” especially over NC&StL’s gorgeous mountain territory east of Nashville via ancient Cowan Tunnel.

Speaking of breathtaki­ng mountain scenery, here’s a vote for bringing back the North Coast Hiawatha, the longdistan­ce train Amtrak ran in ChicagoSea­ttle service until 1979. Although it basically followed the route of today’s Empire Builder as far as Minneapoli­s, beyond there it was very much a revival of Northern Pacific’s beloved North Coast Limited, at least in spirit. Over the years Amtrak trains 9 and 10 bounced back and forth between daily and triweekly service and never quite matched the Builder in popularity, but you couldn’t argue with the scenery, thanks to their fabled traversals of Homestake Pass and the Bitterroot Mountains.

Not even scenery or local political pressure were enough to save the North Coast Hiawatha, and it got caught up in a plan to cut 12,000 route miles from the Amtrak system. The last editions of the train departed Seattle and Chicago on Oct. 7, 1979.

The loss of the North Coast Hi really stung for me, as I’d lived in Milwaukee in 1974-76. I often saw the train coming through town, and frequently reminded myself “hey, man, you better ride this while you have a chance.” I kept putting it off, of course, and blew the opportunit­y. I’ve ridden the Builder many times, but, in a historical context, always considered NP’s North Coast Limited to be a more interestin­g train. Maybe it was that lovely two-tone green paint scheme designed by Raymond Loewy, or its vaunted Montana scenery, or just the fact the train took a more meandering route to the Pacific Northwest.

Of all the services that might come back, the North Coast Hiawatha might have the best chance. Since 2020, a multi-county group in Montana called the Big Sky Passenger Rail Authority has been pushing for the train’s return, touting the fact that it would serve Missoula, Billings, Bozeman, and Butte, arguably more of a true “corridor” than the Builder’s route. I’ve got my fingers crossed.

KEVIN P. KEEFE joined the Trains staff in 1987, became editor in 1992, and retired in 2016 as Kalmbach Media’s vice president, editorial. His biweekly blog “Mileposts” is at Trains.com.

 ?? ??
 ?? Robert A. Hadley ?? In 1939, the eastbound Detroit-Cleveland Mercury behind a streamline­d 4-6-2 clatters over the junction at Delray, Mich. It is one of many passenger corridor revivals possible.
Robert A. Hadley In 1939, the eastbound Detroit-Cleveland Mercury behind a streamline­d 4-6-2 clatters over the junction at Delray, Mich. It is one of many passenger corridor revivals possible.
 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States