Contaminated blood: a total lack of ethics
THE reality of the NHS in Britain, over the last 70 years, is an opportunity for any citizen who has developed mentally beyond self-centredness, celebrity worship, market forces as human destiny, or wasting billions on sport, to distinguish between a Labour
NHS and Conservative NHS, two completely opposite forms of a national institution.
A Labour NHS invites all adults to donate blood, freely and eagerly, out of love for other, unknown people.
The Conservative NHS, sharing the same beliefs and culture as the USA, thinks that money is a clever inducement, to pay convicts for blood, and for that reason British Tories at all levels thought it efficient to mix blood from these contrasted sources. Why not?
You should be able to recognise the true explanation of contaminated blood, and decades of criminal deception in our Department of Health, has less to do with scientific knowledge than the absence of ethical principles in the minds of authorities selected to control thousands of conscientious doctors. Human society is shaped by just those forces, the beliefs of each voter, when altruism is downgraded by greedy self-interest.
Labour NHS is supported by citizens proud to pay taxes, for
ethical principles. A Conservative NHS has been corrupt for 70 years, where public taxes paid into the
NHS have been siphoned off into an army of privatised agencies, where it disappears as dividends amongst shareholders who might have no interest whatsoever in the nation’s health.
Educated haematologists would always wish to test blood from these different sources, scientifically, to discover if it contained hepatitis C. But the stupidest adult should be able to see now that ambitious Conservative politicians have exactly the same indifference to truth as the voters who sent them there.
C N Westerman Brynna, Mid Glamorgan