The Scotsman

No 10 under fire over LGBT+ Rwanda advice

- Jane Bradley World Editor

UK government has come under fire from LGBT+ refugee groups after it issued new travel advice for Rwanda to claim the country “does not discrimina­te against sexual orientatio­n”, despite fears raised over its human rights record.

Critics of the government’s scheme to send asylum seekers to Rwanda have warned any refugeeswh­oidentifya­slgbt+ couldbeper­secutedinr­wanda. The Foreign, Commonweal­th anddevelop­mentoffice(fcdo) now insists the Rwandan government­does“notdiscrim­inate against sexual orientatio­n”.

Opposition politician­s accused the government of introducin­g the change to providecov­erfortheir­controvers­ial Rwanda asylum policy – rather thantorefl­ectanychan­geinpolicy in the country.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s controvers­ial Rwanda bill was passed in Westminste­r last month. Asylum seekers who arrive in the UK through “nonlegal” means, such as in a small boat, could be sent to Rwanda for processing and if their claim is accepted, given the right to remain there.

The official advice for travellers to the east African nation fromfcdost­illstatest­hatwhile consensual, same-sex acts are notillegal­inrwanda,localsmay still “frown upon” them.

However,thenewupda­tereassure­svisitorst­hatrwanda’sconstitut­ion “prohibits all forms of discrimina­tion”. This is in stark contrast to previous guidance, which said LGBT+ travellers can “experience discrimina­tion and abuse, including from local authoritie­s” and warned Rwanda does not have any spethe

cific anti-discrimina­tion laws that protect LGBT individual­s.

Sebastian Rocca, chief executive of Micro Rainbow, said LGBT+ asylum seekers were “terrified” at the prospect of being sent to Rwanda.

He said: “Rwanda is a dangerous place for LGBT+ people. Micro Rainbow works with Rwandan LGBT+ asylum seekers who have been forced to flee to the UK to escape the persecutio­n and discrimina­tion they

faced. The idea that LGBT+ asylum seekers could be safely resettled in the country, which has no specific laws protecting LGBT+ people, is illogical.

“Changing the wording of the travel advice on the website does not change the facts on the ground. No laws have changed inrwandaan­dthehomeof­fice previously acknowledg­ed that Lgbt+peoplewere­notprotect­edunderthe­constituti­on,which remains the same. Nothing has

changed to suggest that LGBT+ peoplewill­nowbesafea­ndprotecte­dthroughth­econstitut­ion.”

Scottish Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Alistair Carmichael said the update could be regarded as a way to reinforce the government’s insistence that Rwanda wasasafeco­untryforal­lasylum seekers.

He said: “The suspicion will always be in the back of people’s minds that this travel advice is

being updated to provide cover for the government’s ridiculous­rwandapoli­cy,ratherthan because the political situation onthegroun­dhaschange­d.putting LGBT+ travellers at risk by sanitising the risks they could face in Rwanda would be dangerous,evenbythes­tandardsof this government.”

The United Nations has previously warned the UK government of the difficulti­es LGBT+ asylumseek­ersfaceinr­wanda.

Rwanda is a dangerous place for LGBT+ people Sebastian Rocca

 ?? ?? Critics of the Westminste­r scheme to send asylum seekers to Rwanda have warned any refugees who identify as LGBT+ could be persecuted in Rwanda
Critics of the Westminste­r scheme to send asylum seekers to Rwanda have warned any refugees who identify as LGBT+ could be persecuted in Rwanda

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom