Carbon credits: What are they and what do they mean for Scotland?
◆ The system is based on the “polluter pays” according to how much carbon they generate, explains Katharine Hay
Acarbon credit is a token that someone can use to pay someone else to theoretically “offset carbon”.
They represent the avoidance or removal of greenhouse gas emissions, measured in tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent. But what is carbon offsetting?
Carbon offsetting is absorbing carbon from the atmosphere to balance out the harmful carbon emissions generated by an organisation. This is accomplished through the process of carbon sequestration, and this can be achieved through the creation of vegetation such as trees or healthy peatlands, which take in carbon from the air and lock it away as part of their natural lifecycles. It is one of the biggest reasons behind the rush for Scottish land for tree planting and other carbon sequestration practices such as peatland restoration. With its large rural land area, lightly regulated land market and lucrative government subsidies for woodland and peatland projects, Scotland is attractive to those buying into the carbon credit market.
While some businesses and organisations are doing what they can to reduce their volume of emissions at the source, for many there will always be some unavoidable pollution they generate. The two options are to offset their carbon emissions themselves, or pay someone else to do it for them. This is where carbon credits come in.
As an example, let’s say the owners of a shoe manufacturer in Scotland want to offset their emissions so they can say to their shareholders they are a responsible company. They can either buy land to plant trees to offset their own carbon, or buy carbon credits off someone who has the place to do it. So, say the site emits 1,000 tonnes of carbon a year, they can then buy a carbon credit from a landowner or manager who is sequestering 1,000 tonnes a year through tree planting. At this point, the shoe manufacturer can then claim it’s net zero. But it’s not all that simple.
The scheme of carbon credits has proved to be highly controversial. There are concerns companies looking to offset carbon are tempted to just pay someone as a way of “dealing” with their emissions instead of cutting them down at the source themselves. On an international scale, offsets would also require an enormous amount of land to tackle just a small part of global emissions. Oxfam has claimed trees would need to be planted across land five times the size of India if the world is to meet net-zero emissions by 2050 (the Paris Agreement goal) through tree planting alone.
Carbon credits have been branded as a “false solution” to the climate crisis by green campaigners who insist some carbon sequestration projects will take decades to capture the amount of emissions required to offset their carbon.