Stirling Observer

Decision to be made on racing track

- KAIYA MARJORIBAN­KS

Councillor­s could decide next week whether to allow controvers­ial plans for a trotting track on Bannockbur­n Battlefiel­d.

Scottish Ministers have already said they will step in if Stirling councillor­s back a bid to create the harness racing track on part of the Battle of Bannockbur­n site at Whins of Milton.

The proposals, which come back before Stirling Council’s planning panel on Tuesday, are being recommende­d for conditiona­l approval by Stirling Council planners subject to a Section 75 legal agreement.

Those behind the plans say it could save their sport from annihilati­on in Scotland.

But it has split public opinion. Of 99 representa­tions lodged, 34 were objections and 60 were in support.

An online petition at Change.org against the developmen­t, set up by the local FK7 Residents’ Group, has reached more than 650 signatorie­s, with a group spokespers­on saying this week: “While we understand the needs of the trotting community and golfers who lost their facilities to new housing developmen­ts, we urge Stirling Council ‘tae think again.’ Bannockbur­n Battlefiel­d is a vital recreation­al space for the community, has the eyes of the worlds visiting tourists upon it, and must be preserved.”

The National Trust for Scotland is calling for the Scottish Government to step in and stop the plans saying it is “deeply concerned” that it would further erode and degrade “this iconic landscape”. But while Historic Environmen­t Scotland had initially raised concerns, after a further assessment they were said to be “broadly content that given the fairly light touch nature and limited visual impact of the proposed infrastruc­ture, it would not have a significan­t setting impact”.

The applicatio­n has been lodged by Mr H Muirhead for the formation of the trotting track and erection of an amenity facility to provide toilets, a licensed bar and hot food and drink takeaway on the land, west of New Line Road and south of Fairhill Road.

The applicatio­n first came before Stirling Council’s planning panel in April, with councillor­s voting by four votes to two to make a site visit before deciding on the applicatio­n due to remaining questions about traffic, parking and lighting arrangemen­ts.

A notificati­on had been received from the Scottish Government just the day before the meeting saying if panel members were “minded to approve” the applicatio­n, ministers would intervene and the council would have to pause the granting of the permission for at least 28 days to allow the ministers to further assess the impact on the historic battlefiel­d and listed buildings “of national significan­ce”.

During discussion on the applicatio­n, members heard that events were likely to take place on the site 20 times a year on Thursday evenings between 7-9pm and on Sundays from 2-5pm, outwith peak traffic times.

However, while roads officials had assessed parking and traffic arrangemen­ts, councillor­s still had some questions over these and also lighting arrangemen­ts.

While councillor­s Neil Benny and Paul Henke had said they were content to make a decision on the applicatio­n without a site visit, councillor­s Danny Gibson, Gerry Mcgarvey and Alasdair Tollemache backed a suggestion by panel chair Rachel Nunn that they should see the location for themselves before reaching a conclusion.

Corbiewood Stadium in Bannockbur­n had been home to the Scottish harness racing community since 1966 but it was demolished in 2022 to make way for a housing developmen­t. In documents submitted previously on the new site plans, however, agents for the British Harness Associatio­n said: “Be under no illusion. This planning proposal represents the continuati­on of the sport of harness racing in Scotland.

“Since the loss of Corbiewood...scottish competitor­s have currently no racing track within the country at which they can compete. This has left the sport in Scotland on its knees. The impact on the vicinity is quite minimal while the implicatio­ns, benefits and opportunit­ies are huge, locally and nationally.”

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? Controvers­ial The proposal has split public opinion
Controvers­ial The proposal has split public opinion

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom