Daily Mail

David Lloyd has hiked my gym fees by £900 — and wants extra £756 to book a tennis court!

-

Dear Sally

I AM about to turn 24 and have been a member of the David Lloyd fitness club in Northwood in north-west London for nearly ten years, mainly using it to play tennis.

In recent years I have been on a contract for those aged 18-25, offering full access to the club, racquet sports and the spa. When my annual membership came up for renewal in June, I was informed that my fee would rise by 67 pc from £1,335 to £2,232.

The club said the discount I was given previously no longer applied. I wasn’t happy, but reluctantl­y agreed to the new price and believed I would have the same access as before.

I paid upfront as that is cheaper than paying monthly. But when I went online to book a tennis session, I was told I was no longer a racquets member. I complained and was told that adding tennis and the spa would cost another £756 for the year.

L. H., Pinner, North London.

YOU felt the David Lloyd leisure company fed you a nasty lob when you renewed your membership. With the fee increasing by more than double to £2,988 if you wanted to continue with tennis, you feared it was game over.

Plus, if you weren’t happy, you would need to give three months’ notice to leave. You tried your best to resolve things yourself. You asked to have a joint membership with your mum, who has been a member for many years, as this would reduce the fees. But this was denied, as only couples can be joint members.

You asked if they would refund you what you had already paid and then set up a monthly direct debit for the new fee so you could manage the bills more easily. You were told this was not possible.

You asked if you could at least spread the load of the additional £756 charge for tennis and the spa, via monthly instalment­s – but this was also batted away.

You were so irate that you asked me to umpire the dispute. After I put your complaint to David Lloyd, a staff member offered you what you later described as an ‘amazing deal’. This turned out to be membership with tennis and spa access at a cost of £2,376, which is just £144 more than the price quoted without these extras. My interventi­on saved you £612.

You were seemingly given a bad steer over the age discount. You were told that the young person’s discount used to apply to those aged 18 to 25, and this had changed, while David Lloyd says there must have been crossed wires, for which it apologises, as the discount has only applied to those aged 18 to 23 for a long time.

A spokesman says: ‘We aim to offer a wide range of packages to suit members’ lifestyles and ages. We’re sorry for any miscommuni­cation. L.H. has been a long-standing member of the club and we hope that she continues to enjoy her time with us.’

Navigating gym membership fees is a bit of an obstacle course.

It can be worth negotiatin­g. If the desk clerk or person on the end of a live chat won’t budge, try speaking to a manager. In general, gym-goers who want to cancel a contract may have to give notice, the length of which varies between gyms. Exceptions include if a member is injured or seriously ill, or loses their job.

If a gym plays hardball, members should quote the Competitio­n and Markets Authority, which says that a gym contract is unfair if it does not let a member cancel due to serious injury or illness or a change in personal circumstan­ces that means they can’t afford the fees. If a club does not accept this, contact Citizens Advice for help. MY BROTHER and I are executors of our late father’s will and beneficiar­ies under his Clerical Medical whole of life policy, which we believe to be worth more than £80,000. Our father paid monthly premiums from October 1992 until his death in September 2023.

When he died, we instructed our solicitor to deal with matters. Their first correspond­ence with Clerical Medical was on October 4. Ten months on and the policy has not yet been paid, despite the solicitor’s best efforts.

In June and July this year I emailed the insurer myself but got no response. I did get a reply to a letter I sent in July, but this simply asked for documentat­ion we had already provided.

E. N., Blackpool, Lancs IT WOULD seem Clerical

Medical’s clerical side needs a bit of medical attention. Ten months is not an acceptable length of time to wait for a policy payout.

I got in touch with Clerical Medical and it swung into action, confirming that the money would be with your solicitors the next day. Which it was.

It apologised for the delay and said it was caused by the company not communicat­ing clearly with your solicitors that one of the trustee names on your father’s policy needed to be corrected, and then it requesting an HM Revenue & Customs trust registrati­on when it wasn’t needed.

You were grateful for my help, but were surprised to receive just £58,902, when you believed the sum should have been more than £80,000. The premiums are lower for this type of cover than other forms of life insurance because the sum paid out reduces over the term of the policy.

Many choose decreasing term insurance alongside a repayment mortgage, for example, with the cover reducing to mirror the shrinking size of the loan over time. Others choose it to provide a payout to support the family if the breadwinne­r dies prematurel­y, calculatin­g that less money will be needed over time as the children grow older.

The sum assured was £83,536 at the outset, but by the time your father died it had come down to £9,932. The rest of your payout is made up of a fund value of £16,464, and various bonuses of £29,935. The final payment you received included £2,571 in interest covering the period of the delay. Clerical Medical also paid you an extra £980 for the inconvenie­nce caused.

÷ WRITE to Sally Hamilton at Sally Sorts It, Money Mail, 9 Derry Street, London, W8 5HY or email sally@dailymail.co.uk — include phone number, address and a note addressed to the offending organisati­on giving them permission to talk to Sally Hamilton. Please do not send original documents as we cannot take responsibi­lity for them. No legal responsibi­lity can be accepted by the Daily Mail for answers given.

 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom