KEY TAKEAWAYS
The need for PPPS goes beyond raising finance for critical projects, and plays a crucial role in leveraging private sector expertise, innovation, risk allocation and efficiency in project implementation and management. This not only enhances the quality and sustainability of the projects in concern, but also fosters economic growth by creating new opportunities for private sector investment and participation.
Private sector participation has increased in the recent past as governments shift their focus towards governance and social sector investments, particularly in the POST-COVID era. Consequently, governments are withdrawing from various other sectors and increasingly seeking private sector involvement, a practice sometimes referred to as ‘asset recycling’.
Key benefits of PPP sinclude enhancing the capabilities and quality of the asset, providing an aspect of value engineering, and improving the efficiency of the asset. It also reduces funding pressure for the government on projects and assets, which are better managed by the private sector.
Critical success factors for PPPS
Identification of projects
There are two approaches to project identification:the Top-down Approach, where the government defines a country-wide program, and based on this framework, instructs line ministries to identify projects that can be incorporated into the program; and the Bottomup Approach, whereby individual officers within line ministries identify potential projects within their respective sectors and present them for assessment.
A cost-benefit analysis of negotiationis crucial for expediting the number of PPPS that can be signed. As governments and policy advisors evaluate potential
PPPS, they must determine which types of contracts or sectors to engage in negotiations and which to exclude. This approach enables governments to efficiently process a greater number of PPPS.
To make PPPS appealing, there must be a financial incentive for the private sector and financial institutions to participate. It is also advisable for the government to maintain majority ownership of the asset while ensuring an optimal allocation of risks between both parties.
PPP structuring
Effective project structuring, combined with optimal risk allocation, is crucial for attracting the most suitable participants and securing the most favourable pricing for the project. Examples were discussed in the ports and toll roads segments, as well as unconventional sectors such as the creation of industrial estates and sewage waste treatment.
Identifying risks and risk allocation is essential as it ensures that risk is managed and distributed more effectively. The guiding principle in risk allocation is typically to assign each risk to the party best equipped to manage it effectively. Itis also essential for negotiations, as the cost of the risk is baked into the investment.
A sound tendering process is crucial. PPP projects need to be looked at in a competing environment to obtain the best value for money for the PPPS under consideration. Additionally, conducting a preliminary pre-qualification study by the government team helps assess whether bidding parties possess the necessary capabilities to effectively manage the PPP.
A capable government teamis essential for securing broad stakeholder support. Strong team dynamics and multidisciplinary skills, including sector expertise, are crucial. Such a team can effectively address various aspects of PPP negotiations, ensuring the best outcomes for the country.
Legislative framework
The existing legislative framework in Sri Lanka is sufficient. Numerous PPPS have been successfully established and completed across various sectors under the current laws. However, what is necessary are policies to effectively manage the
PPP process, including the handling of competitive procurement and unsolicited bids.
The Public Finance Management Act establishes a robust foundation for enhancing fiscal discipline in the assessment of viable PPPS. It enables the creation of a public investment committee responsible for reviewing diverse types of public investments, whether from the consolidated fund, external resources or via PPPS, thus centralizing the evaluation process. Additionally, the forthcoming PPP law will integrate with the Public Finance Management Act, fostering greater cohesion and coordination.
Project financing
Typical funding for large projects involves equity from the private sector and debt from various sources. Other markets have also explored the possibility of REITS and other alternative funding methods. In Sri Lanka, the number of organizations capable of making substantial longterm equity investments (patience capital) is limited given the risk appetite and financial capacity. Therefore, attracting foreign funding is crucial for the country.
Foreign funds also bring credibility to PPPS, and signal to other potential investors and stakeholders that projects in the country can be viable and well-managed, thereby boosting overall confidence in the country, particularly given the current country credit rating.
External guarantees from institutions such as the World Bank are explored to reduce country risk, provide assurance to lenders and improve pricing.