Around 700 tons of poo a day
LIVESTOCK carriers, often shrouded in controversy, have once again captured the attention of South Africans, particularly Capetonians, following the docking of cattle ship Al Kuwait in Cape Town on Sunday night.
The debate surrounding these vessels encompasses a myriad factors.
The historical roots of livestock shipping, according to Shipyard, trace back centuries, with ancient civilisations utilising maritime routes to transport animals for various purposes.
From the Roman Empire’s trade in exotic animals for entertainment to Polynesian migrations with domesticated livestock, the practice has been ingrained in human history.
Fast-forward to the modern era, and livestock carriers are part of global trade, driven primarily by economic considerations.
The demand for fresh meat, consumer preferences for specific labels of origin, and unequal technological development all contribute to the continued existence of these vessels.
In regions where meat processing is costly or infrastructure is lacking, importing live animals offers a more economically viable solution.
For example, live cattle export is widely practised in Australia with the country’s Agricultural Department recording 600 000 live cattle exported in 2022, after peaking at 1.3 million in 2018.
The majority of cattle are destined for Asia and the Middle East where it is more economically viable to import live cattle instead of processed meat.
In 2023, South Africa exported live animals and animal products to the total value of R1.36 billion, said the Department of Agriculture, outlining guidelines for exportation of live animals.
However, the ethical implications of livestock shipping have come under intense scrutiny in recent years, particularly in light of high-profile tragedies such as the capsizing of the Queen Hind and the sinking of the Gulf Livestock, which have raised serious concerns about the welfare of animals transported by sea.
Tight quarters, poor ventilation, and adverse weather pose significant risks to the well-being of livestock, leading to injuries, illnesses and death.
As the Cape of Good Hope SPCA found, the cattle on the Al Kuwait, which was scheduled to depart on Monday night, are being subjected to standing in ankle-deep excreta on hard floors with little to no light.
Apart from the animal welfare concerns, the environmental impact of livestock carriers cannot be ignored, emissions from these vessels contributing to air and water pollution.
According to Farm & Animals, a typical 600kg cow produces around 37kg of excrement a day. With 19 000 cattle on the Al Kuwait, the ship would have to dispose of 703 000kg of waste a day, usually in international waters.
Another cattle ship which made headlines recently was the MV Bahijah, which sailed from Fremantle, Western Australia, on January 5, bound for Israel with about 14 000 sheep and 2 000 cattle on board. The vessel was diverted after a threat of attack by Yemen’s Houthi militia before being ordered home by the Australian government.
Australian animal rights advocates and some politicians branded the treatment of the livestock on the ship as cruel, but the government and industry say they are in good condition.
The government last week rejected an application by the exporter to ship the animals to Israel around Africa, a nearly five-week journey that would have extended their time on board to more than two months.
Unloading the vessel would take several days and the animals would need to be quarantined according to Australian bio-security rules.
In an era of heightened awareness about climate change and sustainability, the carbon footprint of transporting live animals across oceans has become a pressing concern for many.
In April 2023, New Zealand became the first country to ban the export of animals by sea. The decision was fuelled by advocacy efforts by organisations like SAFE For Animals NZ.
The UK is set to join the growing list of countries banning live exports, with proposed changes to the Animal Welfare Bill that will put an end to the shipping of cattle, sheep, goats and pigs for slaughter or fattening. England and Wales have already taken steps to ban live animal exports by sea.
Despite these efforts, the future of livestock carriers remains uncertain. As countries grapple with the competing demands of economics, ethics, and environmental stewardship, the debate over the necessity and morality of transporting live animals by sea continues to evolve.
Whether through technological innovation, regulatory reform, or shifts in consumer behaviour, the fate of livestock carriers will ultimately be shaped by the collective actions of governments, industry stakeholders, and the public at large.