SA retailers face uphill battle in Scope 3 emissions reduction
SA retailers are under mounting pressure as they grapple with reducing carbon emissions. Despite ambitious targets and public commitments, many fall short due to systemic factors such as inadequate data collection, lack of supplier engagement and complex value-chain transparency. While others take strides in sustainable sourcing and emission reduction, the sector’s overall progress remains inconsistent.
Spar Group’s sustainability executive, Kevin O’ Brien, says that without stricter regulations and genuine industry-wide commitment, SA retailers risk being accused of greenwashing rather than driving real change.
What are the main obstacles retail companies face in reducing Scope 3 emissions across their supply chains?
Gathering accurate emissions data from suppliers is a challenge due to the complex and fragmented nature of global supply chains. Many suppliers lack the capability or motivation to provide precise climaterelated data. A potential way around this is to focus on material suppliers (the “hotspots”), as this can still drive meaningful progress.
Integrating stakeholder engagement on sustainability issues is crucial for meeting targets and fostering collaborative relationships that enhance climate mitigation efforts. Relying solely on static data from databases is insufficient; dynamic, real-time data collection is essential for accurately measuring improvements.
Retailers must consider emissions not only from production but also from product use, maintenance and disposal. This responsibility extends across the entire value chain, including suppliers and consumers.
Estimating and tracking emissions can be complicated due to the vastness and intricacy of supply chains, so mapping the entire value chain to ensure transparency in emissions reporting and identifying improvement areas is complex and resource intensive.
What challenges do retailers face in shifting consumer behaviour towards more sustainable practices?
Many consumers lack awareness of the environmental effect of their purchasing decisions on emissions. Retailers can address this through educational campaigns and transparent labelling.
Changing habits and preferences can be challenging. Effective communication about sustainability is crucial. Sustainable products also often come at a higher cost, which can deter price-sensitive consumers.
How does reliance on dairy and meat products in Western diets affect retailers’ ability to achieve their decarbonisation targets?
Dairy and meat products constitute a significant portion of product-related Scope 3 emissions due to high greenhouse gas emissions, such as methane, and deforestation from livestock and feed production.
This makes it difficult for retailers with substantial dairy and meat product lines to achieve decarbonisation targets without substantial changes in sourcing and product offerings.
The introduction of alternative food sources that are less carbon intensive in conjunction with consumer education will assist in achieving decarbonisation targets.
Are there specific policy changes or governmental support measures that you believe could enhance the retail sector’s efforts in reducing emissions?
Policies that incentivise sustainable practices, such as carbon pricing, tax breaks and subsidies for eco-friendly alternatives, can enhance retail sector efforts. Clear regulations and standards can drive consistency and accountability across the industry, for example:
Implementing regulations that require companies to disclose their Scope 3 emissions.
Providing subsidies or tax incentives for businesses that invest in sustainable technologies and practices could accelerate adoption.
Government programmes aimed at enhancing the capabilities of suppliers, particularly small and mediumsized enterprises, to measure and reduce their emissions.
Collaborative commitments by all involved in the food chain and commitments to a just transition by all involved could very well lead to a reduction in negative climate effects and the creation of value through relevant social justice commitments needed for a just transition.
How effective are existing policies and regulations in supporting the retail industry’s sustainability goals, and where do you see room for improvement?
Policies vary globally. While some support sustainability goals, others may fall short. What is clear is that policies often lack the comprehensive scope needed to effectively drive Scope 3 emission reductions.
While there are frameworks and guidelines, enforcement and global alignment are still lacking. Policies need to be more stringent and supportive, ensuring companies have clear guidelines and incentives to reduce emissions throughout their supply chains.
Room for improvement lies in stricter rules and enforcement mechanisms; encouraging retailers to adopt sustainable practices; and coordinated efforts among retailers, governments, and NGOs.
Can you provide examples of successful industry-wide initiatives that have had a positive effect on reduction efforts?
Circular economy initiatives: Promoting recycling, waste reduction, and product life extension. The Spar Group is a founding member of the SA Plastic Pact; a signatory to the Consumer Goods Council Food Loss & Waste Initiative; a member of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil; signatories to the SA Sustainable Sea Food Initiative; and a member of GlobalGap.
Carbon-neutral supply chains: companies offsetting emissions through reforestation or renewable energy projects. Sciencebased targets initiative (SBTi): encourages companies to set and meet science-based emissions reduction targets. This initiative has seen wide adoption across industries and helps companies align their strategies with global climate goals.
Collaborative platforms: initiatives such as the Sustainable Apparel Coalition and the Consumer Goods Forum bring together companies across the value chain to share best practices and develop common tools for measuring and reducing emissions. Spar is a member of the Consumer Goods Council of SA, and we are aligned with their climate change industry roadmap.
How can retailers strike a balance between ensuring sustainability in supply chain while maintaining cost efficiency and product availability?
Retailers must find a middle ground by optimising their supply chains, which means reducing waste, improving logistics and sourcing sustainably. Working closely with suppliers to improve efficiency and reduce emissions can help balance costs while maintaining product availability.
Exploring cost-effective, eco-friendly alternatives, and investing in new technologies and sustainable practices can lead to long-term cost savings and more resilient supply chains