New taxes: Quick wins for fiscal space next year
This year remained challenging for the Philippines with high inflation and elevated interest rates, and the government may have to expedite new tax measures if it really wants to finance priority projects aimed at growing the economy.
The Marcos administration is still dealing with a relatively limited fiscal space amid the lingering impact of the pandemic. Economists are in agreement that new taxes, not just reforms, are crucial in generating revenues and bringing back the economy to a high-growth trajectory.
Economist Leonardo Lanzona, a professor at the Ateneo de Manila University, argued that new taxes are needed especially if the government wishes to undertake its expenditure stimulus programs and not crowd out the private sector.
“At this time, the government has very little options and is literally scraping the bottom of the barrel with its initiatives to indirectly tax food and internet services,” Lanzona told The STAR.
“But the tax revenues from these sources are expected to be trifling. The natural alternative is to impose wealth taxes, which the government does not intend to do.”
For 2024, the government targets to rake in some P4.24 trillion in revenues. This is 10 percent above the P3.846 trillion expected for 2023.
Until now, the government’s economic team, led by Finance Secretary Benjamin Diokno, is banking on the passage of the previous administration’s remaining tax reforms on passive income and financial intermediaries taxation and real property valuation and assessment.
For Union Bank of the Philippines chief economist Ruben Carlo Asuncion, new taxes are very much needed.
“These are, I would say, quick wins for the economy if they eventually pass next year. This would better our bid for the much needed credit upgrade to A rating that would help usher in more investments, and thus, more domestic jobs for Filipinos,” Asuncion told The STAR.
Among the government’s priority measures include the excise tax on single-use plastics, value-added tax on digital services, rationalization of the mining fiscal regime, the motor vehicle user’s charge, and the reform of the pension system for military and other uniformed personnel.
Research and advocacy group IBON Foundation said new taxes are vital to expand the fiscal space especially as the economy grapples with weakening purchasing power, fragile agriculture and manufacturing along with a global economic downturn next year.
But IBON executive director Sonny Africa noted that the kind of tax matters.
“A tax on billionaire wealth and higher taxes for large corporations are the most stable and certain sources of finances to expand fiscal space for important government spending in the decades to come,” Africa told The STAR.
“On the other hand, further taxes on consumption will unduly burden ordinary Filipinos, reduce household welfare and dampen aggregate demand,” he said.
Africa argued that such regressive consumption taxes are exactly what the administration is pushing for and likely to pass – on digital services, sweetened beverages and junk food, and single-use plastics.
Rizal Commercial Banking Corp. chief economist Michael Ricafort, for his part, said tax and fiscal reform measures would help narrow the country’s budget deficit and also curb the increment in the outstanding national debt moving forward.
As of end-October, the budget deficit eased by eight percent to P1.02 trillion from P1.11 trillion as revenues picked up faster than state spending.
The country’s outstanding debt, on the other hand, returned to expansion mode as of end-October, hitting a record P14.48 trillion as the government borrowed more loans and the local currency depreciated.
“In view of the streak of record highs in the government’s outstanding debt in recent months, the intensified tax collections from existing tax laws may not be enough and would inevitably require new tax reform measures to curb additional borrowings by the government,” Ricafort said.
Africa argued that the administration’s so-called fiscal consolidation program has been more about containing expenditures than improving revenues, which are even being collected in a regressive manner that unduly burdens the poor and low-income families.
He emphasized that the biggest barrier to raising resources for all the government spending needed to reduce poverty, boost growth and spur development in a financially sustainable manner is the increasing regressivity of the tax system.
“Too much of the tax base is being shifted to taxing consumption, yet there is just so much to be taken in taxes from an overwhelmingly majority poor and low-income population, on top of the unjust crimping of their already limited consumption,” Africa said.
“On the other hand, tax revenues have been eroded by personal income tax cuts on higher income groups including most of the country’s super-rich families and by corporate income tax cuts including on large foreign and domestic firms,” he said.
Among the proposed tax measures of the government, data showed it can generate P76 billion per year from new taxes on junk food and higher taxes on sweetened beverages.
Another P100 billion over a five-year period is seen from the VAT on nonresident digital service providers.
The last package of the tax reform is also expected to yield some P8.5 billion while single-use plastic tax can generate P6.5 billion. The excise tax on pre-mixed alcohol can likewise give some P400 million.
Ricafort said new and higher tax rates need to be fair, equitable and progressive, especially targeted to those that can afford them or those from the higher income brackets.
Doing so would prevent adding burden to the poor and the most vulnerable sectors.
Another fiscal reform measure being pursued is the rightsizing of the government to reduce state expenditures.
“Sustainable fiscal and debt management over the long-term that benefits further generations starts and ends with good governance, in terms of intensifying tax revenue collections on a recurring basis and more disciplined approach on state spending,” Ricafort said.
As the Philippines moves on toward another year, Lanzona said the government must be more introspective in terms of using available funds properly.
While public funds are limited, he emphasized that a number of opportunities exist in light of the digital transformation, the pandemic-induced reconfiguration of global value chains and the efforts toward greening the economy.
For Africa, top of next year’s wish list is for the administration and the economic team to stop seeing the economy narrowly from statistics and disconnected from the lives of ordinary Filipinos so that they will take more action for change on the indicators that really matter.
He maintained that a genuinely progressive tax system with lower taxes on the consumption of ordinary Filipinos and higher taxes on the incomes and wealth of the rich is necessary.
Revenues from these measures are seen expanding and improving publiclyprovided social services, ensuring longterm economic development, and creating jobs and a more dynamic modern economy.
“Growth, deficits, investments, exports and the other handful of such macroeconomic indicators are all just means to the real ends of development – decent work, improved family incomes, affordable and accessible social services, and other social indicators matter most of all,” Africa said.