SHOULD SCHOOL ENFORCE SPECIFIC HAIRCUT POLICIES FOR LGBTQIA+ INDIVIDUALS OR NOT?
CHRISTIAN JHAMES M. SUNGA
Stubbs (2008) asserts that inclusive education isn't a new concept, having long been a community practice. To ensure sustainability and community engagement, it's crucial to acknowledge and build upon this foundation. However, societal evolution seems to contradict this, with LGBTQ+ individuals facing discrimination based on their appearance in schools, meant to be their supportive environments. This discrimination often manifests in enforced haircut policies, especially affecting those who embody both masculine and feminine traits.
A recent incident at a hair salon, where photos of LGBTQ+ teens conforming to school haircut policies sparked debate, highlights this issue. Responses varied, with some criticizing the unnecessary conformity and its potential impact on self-esteem. Miss Trans Global 2020, Mela Franco Habijan, questioned the bias in enforcing uniform policies, emphasizing the importance of following DepEd's Gender Responsive Basic Education Policy.
Delving deeper, physical attributes shouldn't impede a student's right to education in an evolving, inclusive society. DepEd Order No. 32 Series of 2017 mandates gender equality, sensitivity, and non-discrimination in education. Disregarding LGBTQ+ rights contradicts this directive.
Testimonies like Marisol's from a Human Rights Watch report illustrate the damaging effects of enforced norms, leading to mental health issues among LGBTQ+ students. This includes public humiliation, bullying, and academic decline, ultimately excluding them from education.
In conclusion, fostering self-expression enhances self-esteem and academic engagement. Haircut policies should be revised to accommodate diverse identities, including LGBTQ+ students, and promote inclusivity. Schools need to acknowledge and respect the uniqueness of each student, ensuring an environment where all can thrive authentically.