Oman Daily Observer

Ukraine’s $61 bn lifeline is not enough

- HUGO DIXON The author is a British business journalist and the former editor-in-chief and chairman of the financial commentary website Breakingvi­ews which he cofounded. — Reuters

Ukraine last week got a vital $61 billion lifeline from the United States. But it still needs a medium-term funding plan to withstand Russia’s onslaught. Mobilising Moscow’s frozen central bank assets to provide compensati­on for war damages should be central to this.

Combined with commitment­s from other countries the latest US package – which will mostly provide Ukraine with weapons and train its troops – should see Kyiv through to about the end of next year. That is certainly better than the situation the country faced a week ago, when it was running dangerousl­y low on military supplies with which to defend itself.

But Ukraine could run out of weapons again in late 2025. Even if Joe Biden is re-elected as US president this November, he may struggle to get more money out of Congress. And if Donald Trump returns to the White House, American support for Ukraine will be even more precarious given the Republican candidate’s previous lack of commitment to Kyiv’s defence.

A multi-year funding plan, by contrast, would have several benefits. For a start, it would provide some insurance against US political swings.

It would also boost Ukrainian morale and give Western arms manufactur­ers greater confidence to ramp up production. Russian President Vladimir Putin’s calculatio­ns might also change if he thought Ukraine could hold on for many more years. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy probably wouldn’t be able to retake much territory because that would mean attacking Russia’s heavily defended positions at a time when Ukraine is finding it hard to recruit new soldiers.

But he might be able to negotiate a peace deal from a stronger position – or freeze the conflict, a bit like North and South Korea suspended their war 71 years ago.

HOW THE MATHS STACKS UP

Ukraine is straining every sinew to hold the line against Russia, an adversary whose $2 trillion economy was 11 times bigger than its own last year. Even though it spent $65 billion on defence in 2023 – an astonishin­g 37 per cent of its economic output – that was dwarfed by Russia’s $109 billion outlay, according to the Stockholm Internatio­nal Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).

Western aid plugged the gap. The United States and Europe allocated 88 billion euros in aid to Kyiv last year, of which 47 billion euros was military support and the rest was financial and humanitari­an aid, the Kiel Institute for the World Economy calculates. Allocation­s – support delivered or earmarked for delivery – are a proxy for money that was disbursed.

How much Kyiv needs in future depends on what sort of war it fights. A defensive campaign would cost less than an attempt to expel Russia from large chunks of land. But given that the Kremlin is ramping up its own military expenditur­e, Ukraine in future will probably need at least as much every year as the 88 billion euros its allies allocated in 2023.

As of the end of February, Ukraine’s allies – mostly the European Union – had committed but not yet allocated 103 billion euros, according to the Kiel Institute. Add in the US package, equivalent to 57 billion euros, and Kyiv now probably has enough aid to last until late 2025.

LONGER RUNWAY

The main way to get much more money to Ukraine is to mobilise Russian assets that Western countries froze at the start of the war, worth about $320 billion. Ideas include confiscati­ng the assets, using them to support a loan that Western countries would give Ukraine, or handing Kyiv the interest they generate.

The United States is pushing a plan to raise money for Kyiv by capitalisi­ng interest payments building up at Euroclear, the clearing house in Belgium where most of the assets are held.

A special-purpose vehicle would probably issue a bond backed by future interest rates and pay the proceeds to Ukraine. The United States hopes to persuade its partners in the Group of Seven rich democracie­s to back this idea at their summit in June.

If the countries guaranteed interest from the assets for a decade, they might raise 30 to 40 billion euros. While this will help, it will not be a game changer because it will fund Ukraine for less than half a year. Getting Kyiv $320 billion, however, would be a different propositio­n.

That would finance the war until at least the end of 2028. If the belligeren­ts ended or froze the conflict before then, Ukraine could use some of the money to rebuild its economy, which the World Bank estimates will cost $486 billion.

Although Biden now has the authority to seize Russian funds, only about $5 billion of the assets are in the United States.

The bulk are in European Union countries, which have legal qualms about confiscati­ng them.

 ?? ??
 ?? — Reuters ?? An elderly Ukrainian woman looks at different meat products in a supermarke­t in Kyiv, Ukraine.
— Reuters An elderly Ukrainian woman looks at different meat products in a supermarke­t in Kyiv, Ukraine.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Oman