The Press

China is stockpilin­g – should the West be doing the same?

- Roger Boyes

When China was in full gallop, its industries gobbled up the world’s rare metals and energy. Now it is growing more slowly, yet it is still buying in huge amounts of commoditie­s. Hoarding them for what exactly? A further bid to supplant the United States in world markets – or something more sinister?

There are two convention­al explanatio­ns. The first is that Beijing is following a long-term plan that will position it as the undisputed champion of the green revolution: a global leader in electric vehicle (EV) production, in solar panels and wind turbines.

Until now, it has been the major refiner of lithium for EV batteries but has only hard-to-extract reserves of its own. Chinese president Xi Jinping's ambition is to take a commanding position in the whole supply chain. By 2029, 101 of the additional 136 lithium-ion battery plants planned for developmen­t will be in China.

That is the Chinese mercantili­st playbook. It has been given urgency by the possible re-entry to the White House of Donald Trump. His tariff war on Chinese exports – Xi retaliated by imposing duties on American soya beans – marked the start of a miserable phase in US-Chinese relations, the first augury perhaps of the beginning of the end of China’s long rise.

A President Trump, the Chinese assume, will wind down the US commitment to Ukraine and focus on the containmen­t of China. That could mean a regional flashpoint – tension over Taiwan, perhaps – leading to an attempt at a US-led blockade of shipping lanes on the approach to Chinese ports. From that point of view, China’s current stockpilin­g makes some sense. It’s not just defence-related minerals that are being bought in, not just gas and oil, but also wheat, maize and the soya beans that feed China’s 400 million pigs.

Here then is the nub. China is digging in not only for an open scrap for market share, but also for a kind of siege led by a Trump administra­tion determined to thwart Beijing’s cross-spectrum challenge to US power.

The Chinese seem to be succumbing to the kind of blockade-phobia that gripped Europe in the late 1930s: a time of sanctions and counter-sanctions, stockpilin­g and a drive for national self-sufficienc­y. Warehouse space has been expanded massively, so have undergroun­d gas caves. Soya bean storage has more than doubled since 2018; China’s maize stocks will soon account for 67% of the world’s total.

This is the point where fear of Trump’s unpredicta­ble China policy intersects with a kind of war-readiness of its own. The lesson from the Ukraine war for Chinese military planners is that this is not the age of Blitzkrieg.

Just as Russian president Vladimir Putin failed to snatch Kyiv early in his war against Ukraine, so a blockade or full-scale military invasion of Taiwan will not necessaril­y be the quick knockout deemed likely in tabletop exercises. The question, short or long war, thus haunts the Chinese military as surely as it dogged the Germans in the first half of the 20th century.

The length of the Great War exhausted the generals; afterwards a detailed account of the performanc­e of each service was compiled for the next generation of military leadership. Given Germany’s lack of raw materials for arms production – the copper used in artillery shells, the nickel in armoured steel – how could the country expect to slog it out for as long as the Great War?

That was an argument for Blitzkrieg, quick and mobile, followed by fuel substituti­on and synthetic materials and ersatz food, for the seizure of foreign oil fields and, above all, for long-term storage. Or, one could argue, for not engaging in a long war at all. But China doesn’t seem to be treading that path. According to US estimates, it is spending about US$700 billion (NZ$1.164 trillion) to modernise its armed forces. It now boasts the world’s largest navy, biggest coastguard and maritime militia, biggest army and sub-strategic missile force, as well as significan­t advances in hypersonic missiles and quantum computing.

Underpinni­ng that hardware are the metals and minerals disappeari­ng into China’s warehouses. That’s the copper wiring used in guidance systems, the nickel used in the armour plating of tanks, in military batteries and aerospace alloys, the lithium used not only in the EVs in our streets but also powering China’s intelligen­ce satellites, the antimony handy for armourpier­cing bullets and night-vision goggles. Quite a stash.

What do we do about it? We stop neglecting our own depleted stocks of metals and ammunition, we compete more strenuousl­y with China in the ‘‘Lithium Triangle’’ of Argentina, Bolivia and Chile, and we stop looking away as Beijing develops 62 mining projects in lithium, cobalt, nickel and manganese.

Xi hints that 2027 is the target year for China ‘‘reunifying’’ with Taiwan. That’s when the world changes. Now’s the time, as they used to say in the trenches, to dig or die. – The Times

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand