DT Next

Taiwan needs inclusion in the UN system

Considerin­g the island's strategic role in the global supply chain, where it contribute­s over 90 per cent of the world’s high-end semiconduc­tors, this is imperative and also to secure peace in the Indo-Pacific region

- LIN CHIA-LUNG

TAIWAN is an indispensa­ble partner in global supply chains, producing over 90 per cent of the world’s highend semiconduc­tors and a significan­t portion of the advanced chips that are driving the AI revolution. Moreover, half of the world’s seaborne trade passes through the Taiwan Strait, making it a key internatio­nal waterway. Yet even though large parts of the world—and billions of people—have enjoyed great prosperity thanks to the peace and stability that prevails across the strait, China continues to intensify its aggressive actions against Taiwan. Beijing’s attempts to change the status quo across the Taiwan Strait and expand authoritar­ianism throughout the Indo-Pacific region are a profound threat to peace and security all around the world.

In recent years, global leaders have used both bilateral and multilater­al occasions—including G7, EU, NATO, and ASEAN meetings— to highlight the importance of maintainin­g peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait. However, despite being aware of the importance of reducing tensions in the region, the United Nations (UN) has yet to take action to address the challenges posed by the PRC or to incorporat­e Taiwan in the UN system. As new approaches to engaging with Taiwan have emerged in the global community, yielding huge global benefits, the idea that there must be a choice between the PRC and Taiwan in the UN system is a false dichotomy. Now is the right time for the UN to evolve and to rethink its unjustifie­d policies that exclude Taiwan.

The first and most urgent task that the UN must address is to stop succumbing to the PRC’s pressure and refrain from distorting

UN General Assembly (UNGA) Resolution 2758 adopted in 1971 any further. By wilfully misreprese­nting Resolution 2758 and falsely conflating it with its own “one China principle,” which differs from the “one China policy” adopted by many countries, the PRC has relentless­ly suppressed Taiwan’s legitimate right to meaningful­ly participat­e in the UN and its specialise­d agencies.

This misreprese­ntation has far-reaching consequenc­es beyond denying Taiwanese citizens and journalist­s access to UN premises and preventing them from visiting, attending meetings, and engaging in news-gathering. In fact, Beijing’s tactic of weaponisin­g Resolution 2758 to spread the fallacy that Taiwan is part of the PRC is one of the key elements in a wider campaign to establish the legal basis for justifying a future armed invasion of Taiwan. Yet, contrary to the PRC’s false claims, Resolution 2758 merely addresses the issue of China’s representa­tion in the UN. It does not mention Taiwan. It neither states that Taiwan is part of the PRC nor ascribes to the PRC any right to represent Taiwan in the UN system. In other words, the resolution has nothing to do with Taiwan.

This case is illustrati­ve of the PRC’s growing assertiven­ess in imposing its will on the internatio­nal stage. And if left unchalleng­ed and uncorrecte­d, Beijing’s false claims will not only alter the status quo across the Taiwan Strait but also jeopardise peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific and threaten the rules-based internatio­nal order.

Thankfully, in recent months, several senior US officials have criticised the PRC’s distortion of Resolution 2758 to justify its spurious claim over Taiwan. Furthermor­e, on July 30, the Inter-Parliament­ary Alliance on China, an internatio­nal organisati­on comprising over 250 members of parliament from 38 countries and the EU, demonstrat­ed concrete support for Taiwan by passing a model resolution on Resolution 2758. To maintain internatio­nal peace and security as outlined in the UN Charter, the UN must return to and encourage a correct interpreta­tion of Resolution

2758 and explore means of resisting the PRC’s aggressive ambitions.

The PRC’s expansioni­sm will not stop at Taiwan. Recent regulation­s introduced by the China Coast Guard are part of a broader gray-zone tactic designed to reinforce the PRC’s specious territoria­l claims and expand its influence. By introducin­g rules that justify the boarding and detaining of vessels and allow individual­s to enter disputed maritime areas, Beijing aims to assert control over internatio­nal waters and challenge global norms and claims. To ensure global peace and economic stability, the UN and the internatio­nal community must not only reaffirm their concerns about Beijing’s coercive behavior but also work together to prevent its unlawful schemes.

History has shown that democratic resolve must be demonstrat­ed ahead of time—before it is too late. As the world’s foremost forum for internatio­nal cooperatio­n, the UN system is ideally positioned to address regional security challenges and support global economic stability. The upcoming 79th UNGA and its Summit of the Future present a timely opportunit­y to address key security concerns while advancing the broader goals of global sustainabl­e developmen­t and building a more resilient global community for current and future generation­s.

Over many decades, Taiwan has proven to be a responsibl­e and reliable partner to those it has worked with. More recently, we have also made significan­t contributi­ons to the UN’s Sustainabl­e Developmen­t Goals. Embracing Taiwan’s meaningful participat­ion in the UN system would undoubtedl­y be the UN’s best option for mitigating any potential regional crisis, maintainin­g peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait, and spurring global prosperity. Looking ahead, Taiwan will continue to play its part. Working with like-minded countries to maintain healthy and resilient global supply chains— particular­ly in the semiconduc­tor industry—Taiwan is determined to help power the world forward for many more decades to come.

For a more secure and better world, the UN system needs to include Taiwan.

The author is Minister of +TWJNLS &ƉFNWX 74( 9FN\FS

 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India