South China Morning Post

Journalist­s will need official nod to access vehicle registry

Transport commission­er to review applicatio­ns on basis of public interest and national security

- Lo Hoi-ying and Harvey Kong

Journalist­s will need permission from Hong Kong’s transport commission­er to access the personal informatio­n of vehicle owners, with authoritie­s saying applicatio­ns might be rejected on national security grounds or if a case is not in the public interest.

Commission­er for Transport Angela Lee Chung-yan yesterday said she would personally review any applicatio­ns from media outlets to access the government’s vehicle registry to determine whether the “benefits to public interest outweighed the owner’s rights to privacy”.

“If the commission­er reasonably believes that approving a particular applicatio­n will be contrary to the interests of national security, or is likely to threaten public safety or prejudice the maintenanc­e of public order, the applicatio­n shall be rejected,” the new guidelines state.

Last June, the Court of Final Appeal ruled in favour of freelance producer Bao Choy Yuk-ling and said journalist­ic work was a valid reason for accessing official records, with the data used for a documentar­y critical of police action during the 2019 anti-government protests.

But media outlets from Monday would only be allowed to file applicatio­ns to access data such as motorists’ names and addresses under “exceptiona­l circumstan­ces”.

Commission­er Lee said her department could consult other government bodies during the review process, but stopped short of saying how long it could take to approve an applicatio­n.

“Journalist­s, or people from other industries accessing the data, will have to file a written submission detailing the purpose of obtaining the data, how the data will be used and publicised, and the measures taken by the applicant to ensure the privacy of the vehicle owner is not invaded,” she said.

“They also have to declare that they have no alternativ­e ways of obtaining the informatio­n.”

She said there were no “onesize-fits-all” criteria for weighing “public interest” against vehicle owners’ right to privacy, adding the government would consider applicatio­ns on a case-by-case basis.

The guidelines also allow vehicle owners, or those with written consent from the person, to apply through normal channels if they are selling the vehicle, making an insurance or compensati­on claim, or taking part in related legal proceeding­s. Other reasons include filing an applicatio­n for the sake of recovery fees or loan payments, as well as seeking permission to move a vehicle found trespassin­g on private land.

The shake-up is part of a series of digitalisa­tion initiative­s announced by the department that allow drivers and vehicle owners to renew and apply for licences online.

The commission­er said the department had begun the reforms in light of Choy’s legal case. The current system no longer included the “other traffic and transport-related matters” that the freelancer had used to access the registry.

Assistant Commission­er for Transport Candy Kwok Wai-ying yesterday said: “The court verdict stated that the personal data on the registry involved privacy rights, and the transport commission­er has the responsibi­lity to manage the data and lower the risk of exposing the data to abuse.

“The department must ensure that access to the data fulfils the purpose of the database and is obtained lawfully and appropriat­ely.”

The department has blocked all online applicatio­ns to access the registry until Monday.

Professor Francis Lee Lapfung, of Chinese University’s journalism and communicat­ions school, said the overhauled applicatio­n system would create more hurdles for reporters.

Potential issues included uncertain applicatio­n processing times, whether the government had the expertise to determine what constitute­d public interest and the possibilit­y of conflicts of interest if an official came under the media spotlight, he said.

The Hong Kong News Executives’ Associatio­n said while they agreed with striking a balance between rights to access informatio­n and privacy, the department did not clearly define “matters of public interest” nor provide an appeal mechanism.

“The associatio­n hopes the department will state the applicatio­n terms more clearly and definitive­ly to increase transparen­cy, and list profession­al news reporting as a matter of public interest to better protect the public’s right to know,” the associatio­n said in a statement yesterday evening.

The Hong Kong Journalist­s Associatio­n said they were not satisfied with the new arrangemen­ts and argued it was “extremely inappropri­ate” for a government official to decide what constitute­d “public interest” and to interfere in the work of journalist­s.

They also have to declare that they have no alternativ­e ways of obtaining the informatio­n COMMISSION­ER FOR TRANSPORT ANGELA LEE

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China