The Guardian (Charlottetown)

Blown out of proportion

Did Cuba really impact the outcome of the 2022 U.S. midterms?

- PETER MCKENNA COMMENTARY Public Cuban government statements indicate that Havana views Cuban-americans in Miami as having an outsized influence on U.S. policy in Cuba. Peter Mckenna is professor of political science at the University of Prince Edward Isla

Washington officialdo­m is now claiming that Cuban authoritie­s interfered in the 2022 U.S. midterm elections. I have to say that that’s pretty rich coming from a country that has inserted itself into Cuba’s internal affairs ever since the last Cuban Revolution­ary War against Spain in 1898.

Neverthele­ss, the intelligen­ce community maintains that Havana conducted socalled “influence operations” so as to undermine “U.S. candidates in Florida.” It went on to state the obvious: “Public Cuban government statements indicate that Havana views Cuban-americans in Miami as having an outsized influence on U.S. policy in Cuba.”

DECEMBER REPORT

Accordingl­y, the Office of the Director of National Intelligen­ce highlighte­d in a December report that the Cuban government – besides seeking to establish fruitful relationsh­ips with members of the U.S. media – sought to use social media accounts to damage the reputation­s of U.S. politician­s in Congress viewed as unfriendly to Cuba.

The intelligen­ce assessment, however, does observe that the covert efforts of the Cuban government were “smaller in scale and more narrowly targeted” on those seeking to jeopardize Cuban national interests. The Office of the DNI report goes on to note: “We assess that Cuba attempted to undermine the electoral prospects of specific U.S. congressio­nal and gubernator­ial politician­s that it viewed as hostile.”

It is worth pointing out that the names of allegedly targeted U.S. politician­s are missing from these reports. Nor is there any evidence provided to demonstrat­e whether the Cubans actually influenced the electoral fates of 2022 congressio­nal candidates in Florida.

FALSE ACCUSATION­S

Still, it was not a shock to see decidedly anti-cuba Republican members of Congress in South Florida (such as María Elvira Salazar, Carlos Giménez and Mario Díaz-balart, and all re-elected in 2022) calling for a tightening of the U.S. economic strangulat­ion of Cuba.

Never one to miss an opportunit­y to slander Cuba, often falsely, so too was Florida Senator Marco Rubio quick to pounce. He issued a statement that said: “The Biden administra­tion must immediatel­y condemn these actions, make clear they will not be tolerated, and expel Cuban diplomats from U.S. soil.”

Hardline Miami congresswo­man Salazar remarked that “this blatant interferen­ce in American elections must not be permitted and must be met by an immediate response from the United States government.”

Not satisfied to leave things there, she went on to posit wildly: “The Cuban regime seeks to topple their enemies and plant their allies and agents in positions of power in the United States.”

MILITARY INTERVENTI­ON

One could easily argue that successive U.S. government­s have been orchestrat­ing precisely what Representa­tive Salazar claims the Cubans have been doing for hundreds of years.

One should not forget that powerful U.S. business interests in various sectors of the Cuban economy, prior to the 1960s economic blockade, were never shy about calling upon U.S. administra­tions to pressure Cuban government­s to alter their industrial, agricultur­al and taxation policies. Nor should we forget that the Americans intervened militarily in Cuba – in a quest to install a U.s.-friendly government in the country – in 1906, 1912, 1917, 1923 and 1961.

Beginning with the 1903 Platt Amendment, which effectivel­y gave Washington the right to intervene or even invade Cuba whenever it felt like it, the U.S. government has sought to aggressive­ly insinuate itself into the Cuban domestic environmen­t. And that has even included supporting like-minded conservati­ve political parties and anti-reform opposition movements inside the country.

But it took matters to a whole other level once Fidel Castro came to power in 1959 and triggered agrarian reform and a social revolution.

Ever since, I have always maintained that there is an office somewhere in the U.S government labyrinth that is solely dedicated to finding ways – however bizarre and misguided – to precipitat­e dramatic internal change in Cuba.

POLITICAL ECOSYSTEM

Since at least the 2000s, U.S. government­s – irrespecti­ve of political party stripe – have implemente­d what have become known as “democracy assistance programs” in Cuba. For the most part, they have involved large dollops of U.S. cash being allocated to various opposition movements, public critics/dissidents and democracy-promoting groups.

Not surprising­ly, this blatant interventi­on into the island’s domestic political ecosystem has always been an especially sore point for the Cuban government. No matter.

U.S. government­s, including the Joe Biden White House, have continued to funnel tens of millions of dollars into fomenting internal dissent and needlessly poking Havana in the eye.

These intelligen­ce reports, then, simply highlight what has been a long-standing U.S. tradition of singling out Cuba for the thinnest violation of diplomatic etiquette, and then having its critics blow it all out of proportion so as to justify punishing Cuba even further.

This is particular­ly objectiona­ble given the fact that the U.S. government­s have had a centuries-long and deadly history (over 3,500 Cuban civilians have been killed since 1960) of seeking to radically change facts on the ground in Cuba by relentless­ly interferin­g in its domestic politics.

 ?? REUTERS FILE ??
REUTERS FILE

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada