The Guardian Australia

Mark Speakman calls on NSW Liberal director to resign after ‘monumental stuffup’ over council elections

The New South Wales Liberal leader, Mark Speakman, says the party’s state director, Richard Shields, must resign immediatel­y after a “monumental stuff-up” over next month’s local government elections.

The Liberal party missed the noon Wednesday deadline to lodge the necessary paperwork to nominate candidates, meaning there will be no Liberal candidates in eight councils in Greater Sydney and regional NSW at the 14 September elections.

All up, the Liberals failed to nominate 136 candidates across 17 councils, according to election analyst Ben Raue, who runs the Tally Room blog. The party managed to “partially nominate” candidates in some of the affected councils, such as Canterbury­Bankstown.

Speakman on Thursday said Shields was to blame and confirmed he had spoken about his resignatio­n with the federal opposition leader, Peter Dutton.

“We had a conversati­on. He can say what he said, but I’m … not going to say for him,” Speakman said.

“Our party administra­tion has let the candidates, the party members and the general public down. This is a debacle. There’s no other way to describe it.

“Unfortunat­ely, in these circumstan­ces, the state director has to fall on his sword. He is the CEO who runs the organisati­on. He is the CEO who is responsibl­e.”

Sign up for Guardian Australia’s free morning and afternoon email newsletter­s for your daily news roundup

Speakman would not place blame on the NSW Liberal party president, Don Harwin, when asked whether he should share responsibi­lity for the error.

According to Raue’s analysis ahead of the NSW electoral commission’s release of the full list of candidates on Thursday afternoon, the scale of the disaster would be worse than the Liberal party had expected.

There would be no Liberal candidates in the following councils: Blue Mountains, Campbellto­wn, Cessnock, Lane Cove, Maitland, Northern Beaches, Shoalhaven and Wollongong, Raue predicted.

He found the following councils would be partially affected, meaning only some Liberal candidates will be able to run: Bayside, Camden, Canterbury-Bankstown, Central Coast, Georges River, Hornsby, Newcastle, North Sydney and Penrith.

Shields on Wednesday blamed the error on a lack of resources, releasing a statement that said the secretaria­t was “unfortunat­ely … unable to nominate in all of the local government areas that were put forward by the state executive”.

Shields leads the Liberal secretaria­t, which shares responsibi­lity for the party’s administra­tion in NSW and is in charge of submitting the paperwork to nominate council candidates, including those who are already sitting councillor­s.

Guardian Australia contacted Shields for additional comment.

Speakman said he had been “perso

nally unaware of any resourcing issues”.

“I think all of us are embarrasse­d that this is happening for the Liberal party,” he said.

“[Shields] should have either gathered the additional resources he needed, or, alternativ­ely, departed from the centralise­d process and told at least a number of candidates to lodge their nomination­s themselves.”

Speakman conceded the administra­tive fiasco would damage the Liberals’ brand, including at future state and possibly federal elections.

He said the party was exploring whether there were any avenues for affected candidates to run, including asking the NSW Electoral Commission for leniency on the deadline or the Minns Labor government to legislate an extension.

Asked if he thought any candidates who missed out due to the error would take legal action against the party, Speakman said: “I doubt it, but I don’t know the answer.”

The NSW deputy Liberal leader, Natalie Ward, said she was “furious” on behalf of candidates, party members and voters.

“I’m so upset and disappoint­ed for each and every one of them,” she said.

Speaking on 2GB, Dutton described the issue as a “mess”.

“The mess is obviously an administra­tive error where they haven’t submitted the forms on time,” he said.

“And you’re right, that’s, it’s not acceptable. And those discussion­s are taking place at the moment. We want, you know, to make sure that there is a proper administra­tive process put in place. And they failed in that regard. And it’s very, very disappoint­ing to see.”